Whenever Airmar launches a new transducer the quality-focused part of the angling-community starts buzzing. That has also been the case with the brand new TM165HW, here we will take a closer look at it.
The technical bit.
Let us start with a few specifications.
With the three examples provided in Airmars technical bulletin we see examples of frequency and cones with TM165HW. 150 kHz - 30 degrees, 210 kHz - 34 degrees and 235 kHz 32 degrees. We have previously seen this in their 1000W High Wide element (like in SS75HW and TM185HW) but this is the first time they apply it to a 600W-element.
The practical bit.
So what does all this tech translate to when on the water with a fishingrod in your hand? Notice the "fishingrod in your hand", because the wide coneangle on TM165HW makes it less then ideal for this simply looking for depth or structure. (Look to P66, TM260 or TM185H for that). Unfortunately we have not had the chance to try TM165HW yet, but based on the specifications and practical experience with Airmars other transducers, we can still make a few assumptions.
As mentioned the wide coneangle of TM165HW comes with a major downside, it is to wide for showing structure in a good way, or giving very accurate depth. This issue will increase with depth, as shown in this diagram:
As your sonar tends to avarage-out structure within the conenagle, a wide conenagle will never give as accurate depth or information on bottom-composition and structure as a transducer with a less wide coneangle. For the shallow water fisherman that is not a big deal though, as he as scanning sonar (like StructureScan, DownImaging, Downvü etc) for that. But for those venturing into deeper water where the scanning sonars are less than ideal, they are depneding on their 2D-sonar for such information. Based on this, TM165HW is not ideal for the guys fishing for fish deeper than 50-ish meters or so (150 feet). Deeper than that and the drawbacks of the wide coneangle are simply larger then the advantages.
That leaves us with the fisherman fishing in less then 50-ish meters, looking for a transom mount. transducer, These guys have typically been using the TM150M, and have been getting excelent results from it. But 165HW should be even better, providing better on-plane performance due to the higher wattage, and even better separation due to the wider frequencyband. We can also expect less sidelobes from TM165HW, giving even less noise and a clearer image on our screens.
Conclusion.
With TM165HW Airmar is trying to cover what used to be a gaping hole in their product-portfolio, but they missed the latest 5-10 years of the competitions product development when doing so. We would have liked to see it with a coneangle around 20-25 degress instead of 30 though, as the shallow water angler simply does not need such a wide aconenagle as he has sidescan and LiveSight/ LiveScope/ Panoptix/ 360 to see what is around his boat. As TM165HW is now, it is neither fish nor fowl, which is a crying shame. Basicly it is a better option then TM150M due to the higher wattage and higher frequencyband, but it would have been even better with a more sensible coneagle.
Läs mer på bloggen
 |
| Airmars new TM165HW - ideal for shallow water? |
Let us start with a few specifications.
- Q-factor 3
- Frequency range 150-250
- Maximum power 600W
- Weight 0,5kg
- Length of cable 9m
- B75H 130-210/ 15-9
- B75M 80-130/ 24-16
- B75L40-75/ 31-24
 |
| Varience in cone on Airmar TM165HW |
The practical bit.
So what does all this tech translate to when on the water with a fishingrod in your hand? Notice the "fishingrod in your hand", because the wide coneangle on TM165HW makes it less then ideal for this simply looking for depth or structure. (Look to P66, TM260 or TM185H for that). Unfortunately we have not had the chance to try TM165HW yet, but based on the specifications and practical experience with Airmars other transducers, we can still make a few assumptions.
As mentioned the wide coneangle of TM165HW comes with a major downside, it is to wide for showing structure in a good way, or giving very accurate depth. This issue will increase with depth, as shown in this diagram:
 |
| Coneangle vs bottom-coverage for Airmar TM165HW. |
That leaves us with the fisherman fishing in less then 50-ish meters, looking for a transom mount. transducer, These guys have typically been using the TM150M, and have been getting excelent results from it. But 165HW should be even better, providing better on-plane performance due to the higher wattage, and even better separation due to the wider frequencyband. We can also expect less sidelobes from TM165HW, giving even less noise and a clearer image on our screens.
Conclusion.
With TM165HW Airmar is trying to cover what used to be a gaping hole in their product-portfolio, but they missed the latest 5-10 years of the competitions product development when doing so. We would have liked to see it with a coneangle around 20-25 degress instead of 30 though, as the shallow water angler simply does not need such a wide aconenagle as he has sidescan and LiveSight/ LiveScope/ Panoptix/ 360 to see what is around his boat. As TM165HW is now, it is neither fish nor fowl, which is a crying shame. Basicly it is a better option then TM150M due to the higher wattage and higher frequencyband, but it would have been even better with a more sensible coneagle.
Läs mer på bloggen
Kommentera